What does Trump’s win mean for the US economy?

President-elect Donald Trump’s plans for higher tariffs, lower taxes and more curbs on immigration are expected to reignite inflation, but economic forecasters are divided over whether they’ll weaken or boost the U.S. economy in the near term.
Eventually, Trump’s signature economic policies may cancel out the benefits of his plans for lower taxes. That could weaken growth overall but would stop short of triggering a recession, economists say.
But Americans are living in the moment, optimistic that Trump can ease the pain of high inflation over the past four years. Election polls consistently showed the economy and inflation were top of mind. In the last Forbes/HarrisX national poll released Monday before Election Day, 36% of respondents said prices/inflation were their top concern, followed by immigration and the economy at 32% and 31%, respectively.
“I voted for Donald Trump because four years ago, the economy was way better than it is right now and I trust that he will fix the economy again,” said Charles Maleski of Chalfont, Pennsylvania.
Trump, a Republican and the 45th president, won election Wednesday over Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris. Control of the U.S. Senate flipped to Republicans, while as of Thursday afternoon the House remained up for grabs.
Maximize your savings: Best high-yield savings accounts
Investors seem to agree with Maleski. Wednesday, the day after Trump won the presidency, the blue-chip Dow industrials, broader S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite indexes each ended at record highs, with investors expecting lower taxes and deregulation to unleash economic growth and profits, economists said.
The market reaction “validates the view that a Trump administration will be generally good for U.S. businesses,” said Jeffrey Roach, chief economist for LPL Financial in Charlotte, North Carolina.
It’s hard to tell now if all those policies will pan out the way people expect, strategists said.
“There is a great deal of speculation in the market because the policies of a Trump Presidency with a Republican Congress will be starkly different than those of the Biden Administration,” Michael O’Rourke, chief market strategist at JonesTrading, said in an email. “It is incredibly hard to forecast when one does not have the details of the policy in place. Investors are basing decisions on the basic framework of what President Trump plans to do and absent details, they are making the most optimistic judgments.”
Some economists cautioned that Trump’s stated policies may eventually bring some pain to consumers.
“In the longer term, a different scenario may unfold” if government spending and sweeping tariffs on imported goods go unchecked to fan inflation, said Naomi Fink, chief global strategist at Nikko Asset Management.
Additionally, it’s important to note Trump will be a one-term president. “Two-term presidencies typically bring greater negotiations (including fiscal negotiations) between the executive and legislative branches in the second term, which may increase the incentive for a candidate seeking re-election to curtail fiscal largesse,” Fink wrote in a report. “This incentive does not exist for a one-term candidate … (and) could widen the divide between the short-term outcome of extending of the US economic cycle and the impact of longer-term risks.”
But economists were doubtful a recession was in the cards. “We think a period of slower GDP growth in 2025 beckons, rather than a slump,” Samuel Tombs, chief U.S. economist of Pantheon Macroeconomics, wrote in a note to clients.
Here’s a rundown of the potential effects on the economy:
Trump has threatened to impose tariffs of 10% or 20% on all imports and up to 60% on Chinese shipments.
During his first term, Trump’s tariffs socked a tenth of U.S. imports with the fees, largely steel, washing machines and solar panels. His current proposal is more wide-ranging and would affect more consumer goods, Nomura wrote in a research note Wednesday.
American retailers and manufacturers typically have passed along part of their higher costs to consumers through increased prices while absorbing some of them in smaller profit margins.
The race is on:Trump tariffs loom as US suppliers, importers rush to prepare
As a result, Nomura raised its forecast for inflation to 3.1% in 2025 and 2.7% in 2026 from its earlier estimates of 2.3% and 2.1%, respectively. The Fed’s preferred inflation measure was at 2.7% in September, falling from nearly 6% in 2022.
The new fees would reduce Americans’ purchasing power by $78 billion, the National Retail Federation estimates, causing households to pull back spending and hurting economic growth. The Peterson Institute for International Economics has estimated the levies would cost each U.S. household an average $2,600 a year.
Tariffs also would likely prompt affected countries to retaliate with their own levies against the U.S., battering American exports and further damping the economy, Oxford Economics wrote in a research note.
But Ryan Sweet, Oxford’s chief U.S. economist, believes Trump probably will scale back his trade proposals and impose more targeted tariffs on China, Mexico, Canada and the European Union. He also figures the fees will take time to phase in, increasing inflation by a more modest three-tenths of a percentage point in 2027.
What do the election results mean for your wallet? Sign up for USA TODAY’s Daily Money newsletter.
Trump and a Republican Congress likely would extend the 2017 Tax Cut and Jobs Act for both households and businesses. For individuals, that probably would mean lower tax rates, a larger standard deduction and an expanded child tax credit, Sweet said.
Businesses, meanwhile, would be able to continue to write off capital investments and research and development expenses more rapidly, Sweet wrote. But Nomura is skeptical Republicans will support other Trump proposals such as further lowering the corporate tax rate or exempting tips or Social Security from income taxes.
Trump also probably would reduce spending on social services, Sweet said, imposing stricter requirements to beneficiaries of Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, also known as food stamps.
Trump has vowed to reinstate programs that forced asylum seekers to wait in Mexico while their cases are resolved and to deport millions of immigrants who lack permanent legal status. His plan would go well beyond outgoing President Joe Biden’s executive actions that beefed up enforcement in June.
Sweet estimates net migration to the U.S. would fall to about 800,000 a year from 1.1 million. Immigration has accounted for most of a rise in the labor force that has eased pandemic-related labor shortages and wage growth, helping push down inflation. Sharply constricting immigration probably would push up inflation again and crimp economic growth by curtailing hiring and the additional spending of foreign visitors, Sweet and Nomura say.
So what’s the bottom line for the U.S. economy?
Nomura says any benefits to consumer spending from lower taxes would be limited, in part because many of the cuts probably would go to higher-income households that tend to save, rather than spend, their additional income. And the gains likely would be outweighed by the hit to growth from higher tariffs and reduced immigration.
Higher inflation also would mean the Federal Reserve will lower rates just once by a quarter-point next year, Nomura said, instead of the percentage-point drop Fed officials forecast in September.
As a result, both Nomura and Pantheon reckon the economy will grow more slowly next year.
But Sweet says the economic boost from lower taxes should lift growth by three-tenths of a percentage point in 2026 before the stricter trade and immigration policies reduce growth by six-tenths of a percentage point in 2028.
And he figures the Fed will continue to lower rates aggressively until higher tariffs push up inflation 2026.
Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody’s Analytics, said, “While President Trump’s policies will diminish the economy, it will not undermine it, as the President will likely moderate his policies and even pivot if it looks like they are doing significant economic damage.”
(This story was updated to add new information.)